I love the way your mind works. 'Relevance' as a metric of impact/success sounds vital yet so daunting to actually implement - relevant for whom, according to whose standards etc. etc. questions i'm sure you've already dissected yourself (any thoughts?) In a context of impending crisis, limited time and decreasing resources, I do believe the questions you raised should be an integral part of the wider conversation around research ethics.
I love the way your mind works. 'Relevance' as a metric of impact/success sounds vital yet so daunting to actually implement - relevant for whom, according to whose standards etc. etc. questions i'm sure you've already dissected yourself (any thoughts?) In a context of impending crisis, limited time and decreasing resources, I do believe the questions you raised should be an integral part of the wider conversation around research ethics.